A talk for the National Collegiate Honors Council,
Chaos and the Millenniumby
Ralph H. Abraham, email@example.com
Abstract. We support the idea that we are now at a major hinge of history. We review the basic concepts of the mathematical theories of chaos and bifurcations in complex dynamical systems, and apply them to our present moment in history, the chaos revolution, and our future in the chaos millennium.
Dedicated to the General Evolution Research Group
In this short lecture I want to discuss
The first is Chaos, secondly, the Millennium,
and finally and most importantly, Chaos and the Millennium,
and how they go together in an essential way.
2. The mathematics of chaos and bifurcations
the chaos of everyday life, but also,
it means chaos theory, a new branch of
mathematics also known as dynamical systems theory.
The question naturally arises, whether
there is a connection between the mathematical model
of chaos and the chaos of everyday life.
For a long time I rejected this connection,
but now I feel it is justified.
Mathematics has the branches which are standard
books: arithmetic, geometry, dynamics, and so on.
These branches are more or less old.
Algebra and geometry are very old subjects,
coming to us from ancient city-states like
Now I would like to introduce briefly the
essential concepts from chaos theory:
states, trajectories, attractors, basins, and bifurcations.
The most fundamental and important of the basic notions of chaos theory is the state space. This is at the basis of everything and goes back to geometry. It is an imaginary geometrical model for a system. Let's say you have a restaurant. The groceries come in the back door, and the satisfied customers go out the front door leaving money behind. Now you count up the supplies and the money left behind; these counts represent the state of the restaurant (as an economic system) at a given instant. But they may also be regarded as the coordinates of a point in a geometric space, a model for the system. This geometrical model is the state space of this example.
Now here enter the dynamics of the dynamical system: the system changes. Every minute it has a slightly different state. So its representative in the model is a point wandering around in the state space. It is a moving point which draws a curve called a trajectory. And this is where mathematicians put a simple restriction. It is imagined that at every point (state) in this state space there is a single vector, which gives the direction and speed of any trajectory which will ever pass though that state.
Suppose we have such model and we are interested in the long-run behavior of the system. This means that we only want to know, twenty years from now, for example, if there will be a fortune to pass down to the next generation or not. In other words: what is the long-run expectation of a trajectory in the model? We have to start from one point and follow the instructions, drawing the trajectory of the system for a long time. And when we do that, we come to what is called an attractor. There are three kinds of attractors:
- a point attractor, otherwise known as a static attractor, a good model for death,
- a periodic attractor, or oscillation, a model for simple life, and
- a chaotic attractor, a model for more complex life.
The third sort, amazingly, was discovered only recently and unexpectedly, thanks to computer graphics.
Attractors are models for the long-run behavior of an idealized mathematical model for practically any kind of a dynamical system subject to this very rigid restriction that the rules of evolution don't change in time, a so-called autonomous dynamical system.
It is important to know that a typical dynamical system has more than one attractor. Suppose, for example, that there were two. Then some trajectories would evolve toward one, while other trajectories would wind toward the other attractor. And if one attractor models death and the other life, it may be very important to know which final state is in your future! The basin of an attractor is the piece of the state space filled by trajectories tending to that attractor. If there are two attractors, then the state space falls naturally into two pieces: the basin of death and the basin of life. Each attractor has a basin, and each basin contains a single attractor.
Now suppose the rules do change in time. Then the attractors and their basins might change. One kind of attractor can change into another kind. An attractor (along with its entire basin) might disappear into the blue, or a new one appear out of the blue. A basin might suddenly explode or implode, radically changing in size. These significant changes in the picture of the state space determined by the attractors and basins are called bifurcations. There are three kinds of bifurcations:
- subtle bifurcations, in which an attractor changes type
- catastrophic bifurcations, attractors appear out of (or disappear into) the blue
- explosive bifurcations, in which
attractors drastically change
3. The mathematics of history
So now let us look at history from the perspective of chaos theory.
3.1. Interesting times
In the preface
of The Bifurcation Paradigm,
subtitled Interesting Times, futurist and systems
philosopher Erwin Laszlo writes:
Some people are pessimistic and others optimistic, but Laszlo says that he is neither. According to studies made by the World Future Society, and published in its monthly magazine, The Future, the predictions of futurists are right about two times out of three. So we must take Laszlo seriously.
The World Future Society also surveys to see what
other people think about the future. They
surveyed thousands of people, and found that
two-thirds were more optimistic than pessimistic.
Sociologist Paul Ray has studied three subcultures
- the Heartlanders (Traditional Stream, dating from about 1870),
- the Modernists (Modern Stream, from 1920), and
- the Cultural Creatives (Transmodern Stream, 1970).
He defines these groups according to three different
world views. Heartlanders favor a return to the
past. Modernists champion the secular, economic,
and scientific paradigm of the 20th Century. Cultural
Creatives are bearers of a new world view,
currently evolving in reaction to the shadow side
of the Modern Stream. In a social research survey in 1994,
Ray sampled about two thousand people
29%, equivalent to 56 million adults of today's
- Modern, 47%, or 88 million adults, and
- Transmodern, 24%, or 44 million adults.
He concludes that we are now at a Great Divide between the Modern Stream and its Transmodern sequel, the latter yet to be determined.
In this essay we are going to take sides with Ervin Laszlo, the World Future Society, Paul Ray, and the 44 million Transmoderns. And we are going to bring the Chaos Revolution into the picture.
3.2. Bifurcations in history.
At one time people thought that history was continuous and gradually changing, that nothing ever happened suddenly. This was the opinion of Leibniz, who contributed ideas of evolution and linear progression to history. Leibniz is the coinventor with Newton of the calculus, and was also a futurist and historian. Applying the new mathematical ideas of his time to history, he came up with his principle of continuity. He was a gradualist.
The idea of bifurcation (or catastrophe) is a different idea; an idea of discontinuity, of punctuated or saltatory change, sudden or miraculous transformation.
concludes his preface:
For him, bifurcation as an important new word and mathematical concept. He uses it in place of the equivalent general terms, major social transformation, or Great Divide. He sees history as consisting of flat spots punctuated by major social transformations or bifurcations. This is like the evolution of species in the Darwinian sense where long flat spots are followed by the sudden emergence of new species, which may be triggered by collisions with comets. Laszlo is a bifurcationist. Even more: he says that this current transformation, our own bifurcation, is the biggest one in human history. Quite an idea!
Historiography is the study of structure in history. And now that mathematics has been redefined as the study of space-time patterns, we could say that historiography is the mathematics of history.
Jacob Burkhardt of Switzerland was an early bifurcationist. He analyzed the Italian Renaissance as a catastrophic bifurcation, and made his reputation with this theory. It was the first of the saltatory or discontinuous theories of history, coming shortly after Leibniz and his principle of historical continuity.
A controversy developed over this interpretation: was the Renaissance a sudden, catastrophic bifurcation, or just a gradual change? The conservatives in this controversy believed in the continuity of history. They noted that a century earlier, Petrarch, Bocaccio, and others had introduced new ideas in literature which were more or less characteristic of what was later called Renaissance Humanist thought. They said that history was continuous, while Burckhardt and his followers said that it was discontinuous. This controversy, still ongoing today, led to a whole school of the philosophy of history, which came to be known as historiography.
My idea of historiography consists of the space-time pattern of world cultural history, the history movie, superimposed over the space-time pattern of our biosphere, the biogeographical movie. But the simplest representation of this combined space-time pattern is a histomap. In a histomap, geography, which really lives on the two-dimensional sphere of the earth, is reduced to one dimension for convenience, so that geographical space plus time comprise a two-dimensional display in which to locate space-time events.
A histomap by Edward Hull, from around 1900, may be the best histomap ever made. In it, the map of the world is a one-dimensional, vertical interval about eighteen inches high. The time span is a horizontal line about four feet long. It starts in 2500 BC and ends more or less now, with approximately two inches corresponding to a century. A later histomap was the first to actually uses the word histomap. (Sparks, 1931)
A small piece of Hull's histomap is shown in Figure 1. The colored streams denote cultures. They suddenly get wider when there are more people or more territory. There are thin ones and thick ones and they change in their relative sizes as we go down the river of time. Between and around them are icons from archaeological and historical records.
3.4 Bifurcations in a histomap
A bifurcation is a special feature of chaos theory. Applied to historiography, the study of the space-time patterns in history, a bifurcation would be a significant historical event. When you look at a histomap, a bifurcation should just jump out at you.
For example, let's look at Hull's histomap, in Figure 1.The vertical bar in the center is an exemplary bifurcation, the conquest of Alexander the Great. In a decade he conquered most of the known world. All of the separate strands of different cultures were united by him personally, so all the horizontal rivers of culture join that vertical bar. Upon Alexander's death his empire disintegrated, so the vertical bar breaks up into more rivers. This was a double bifurcation.
4. Millennia as the epochs of history between bifurcations
If world cultural history is punctuated by quantum leaps, then there must be periods of gradual change in between the major bifurcations. These we call epochs. The division of the whole of history and prehistory into epochs is a subjective process, and many such divisions, or schemes, have been proposed. We will now review a few of them.
4.1 An archeoastronomical scheme
Ancient skywatchers followed the histomap of the zodiac. The major bifurcations were marked by the passage of the vernal equinox from one zodiacal constellation to another. These events occur roughly every 2,200 years, and are very important in all early cultures. (De Santillana, 1969) Within the recent millennia of the Holocene Interglacial, here are the dates:
BC, Leo; 7,900 BC, Cancer; 6,500 BC, Gemini
4.2 My scheme of three epochs
In Chaos, Gaia, Eros, a scheme of three epochs is proposed, with major bifurcations:
BC, the agricultural revolution.
4.3 William Irwin Thompson's scheme of four epochs
William Irwin Thompson is one of the leading cultural historians of our time. His approach to world cultural history, which is both cultural and mathematical, has a division into four periods which he calls cultural ecologies. Associated with each is a characteristic mathematical style, or mentality. These, with beginning dates, are:
BC, the riverine cultural ecology, with the arithmetic mentality
4.4 What is a millennium?
Originally, the millennium meant a particular period of one thousand years, which was to follow a great bifurcation, according to an apocalyptic doctrine of the ancient Hebrews. (See Cohn, 1957.) When the coming of Christ was thought to signal that event around the year 1 BC, the end of the millennium (that is, the apocalypse) was to fall around the year 1000 AD. (See Revelations.) It did not, but the concept persisted in groups knows as revolutionary millenarians.
The millenarians believe that the end of this world, and of historical time, is at hand. A new world, and a new time, will be inaugurated, usually through the agency of a messiah: a saviour or deliverer. There will be many tribulations and mighty conflicts. The forces of evil will gather themselves up in a last bid for victory. But the good will triumph. The new era P the millennium P will be a time of peace, plenty and righteousness. (Kumar, 1991; p. 7.)
For the purposes of this essay, I am pirating the word millennium, and appropriating it as a synonym for epoch. It has no longer any implication of a period of one thousand years.
Thus, we now have a catastrophic bifurcation from the Periodic millennium to the Chaotic millennium, according to me; from the Oceanic millennium to the Biospheric millennium according to Thompson; or from the Modern to the Transmodern, according to Ray. Whatever you call the epochs, all agree that we are now in a bifurcation; one which is the largest so far, according to Laszlo.
In our global development, we have moved from the ancient arithmetic mentality to the classical geometrical mentality to the modernist dynamical mentality and now finally to the new chaos dynamical mentality, a mentality that is based on the new sciences of complexity, on the new art forms that cross one genre with another, and on the new multidisciplinary sciences such as Lovelock's geophysiology that give us a biospheric vision of our new planetary cultural ecology. (Thompson, 1996; p. 241.)
But in addition to characterizing the dominant mathematical style of the coming millennium, the chaos mentality is able to model the great transformation itself. This is my main message here: Chaos theory can help us to understand our unique experience in this special moment of history, at the dawn of a new millennium. Chaos and the millennium!
5. Education for the chaos millennium
Chaos and the millennium is a very important subject. It is very appropriate for this time, and it has crucial implications for education in general and for honors programs in particular. The school system is where the future is actually created, and honors programs provide a special opportunity to teach new paradigms. So here is something for us to do: the reformation of education on all its levels, to address the future, and to create a society which has sustainable future.
New programs are badly needed which integrate world cultural history, the new branches of mathematics, and the willful creation of the future. Chaos theory must be rescued from the fringes of academia and brought into the center of our schools and universities. Curricular reform in our schools, and integrative programs such as honors programs in our universities, provide opportunities for the renewal of our outworn educational system, and the creation of a viable future.
A am grateful to my colleagues of the General Evolution Research Group and the Lindisfarne Association for the collegial sharing of ideas over the years, to Courtney Sale Ross for awakening me to the possibilities of elementary education, and to Russell Spring for bringing Paul Ray to my attention.
De Santillana, Giorgio, and Hertha von Dechend,
Ray, Paul H.,
Thompson, William Irwin.
Thompson, William Irwin.
Zeeman, E. C.